Really?

May. 13th, 2009 07:08 pm
kutsuwamushi: (don't make me come back there)
[personal profile] kutsuwamushi
"...since there won't be any Native Americans to have already done a certain amount of prepping land for human occupation, nor to be exploited later..."

When The Thirteenth Child was still in the planning stages, Patricia Wrede discussed her idea on rec.arts.sf.composition -- and she said that. [personal profile] elynross has a much longer post about what she said here.

It perfectly illustrates what I meant in my last post about how Patricia Wrede is re-imagining a national myth that is about the discovery and settlement of the Americas by Europeans. Although she recognizes that there were Native Americans present, she can still write of them as "prepping land for human occupation" as if there were no humans already there.

Because Native Americans only exist for the role that they play in the European colonization.
Without Europeans to give them a purpose, they aren't part of the tale, and so Patricia Wrede makes a ridiculous logical contradiction and doesn't notice.

That you can read it as implying that Native Americans are subhuman, well, doesn't help.

Profile

kutsuwamushi: (Default)
kutsuwamushi

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
181920 2122 2324
25 2627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 02:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios